
Jury trials in civil litigation are inherently unpredictable – a reason why over 90 percent of civil cases settle before, or during trial. With respect to trust and estate litigation, i.e., litigation typically brought by a disgruntled (often disinherited) “would be” beneficiary challenging the validity of a trust, will or other estate planning instrument, these issues are of particular concern. In trust and estate litigation, juries may have an inclination to render a verdict they believe is “fair” to all parties, no matter what the facts or law may support. This presents a real concern for trustees, executors, family members, beneficiaries and attorneys trying to defend a decedent’s estate plan against such attacks.
Fortunately, it appears that Kentucky law provides an effective method by which defendants in trust and estate litigation may seek to avoid the risks of an “activist” jury. Where there is an action for declaratory judgment by a disgruntled plaintiff that solely seeks to invalidate a trust, will, or other estate planning instrument, many circuit courts interpreting Kentucky law conclude that such claims must be adjudicated by the court, and not by a jury.
CR 38.01 provides: “The right of trial by jury as declared by the Constitution of Kentucky or as given by a statute of Kentucky shall be preserved to the parties inviolate.” Accordingly, the right to a jury is only guaranteed if required by the Constitution or by statute. But an action solely seeking to invalidate a document transferring real or personal property, like a trust or other estate planning instrument, is an “action at equity” that is to be adjudicated by the court. The case of Averitt v. Bellamy, 406 S.W.2d 410 (Ky. 1966), applies to such claims. In Averitt, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that CR 38.01 does not entitle the plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action to a jury trial: “A suit to set aside the transfer of real or personal property is peculiarly one of equitable cognizance. Regardless of demand, no party has a right to a jury trial (CR 38.01).” Id. at 411.
Indeed, Kentucky law appears to be settled that declaratory judgment actions are generally conceived of as equitable claims. In Triplett v. Livingston Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 967 S.W.2d 25 (Ky. App. 1997), the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling in a declaratory judgment action that: “since the petition was for declaratory judgment seeking a permanent injunction, it was an equitable action in which the court must decide both issues of law and fact.” Id. at 29; see also Marrs v. Kelly, 95 S.W.3d 856, 864 (Ky. 2003)(Cooper, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part)(“A declaratory judgment action is a non-jury trial and involves the trial court in findings of fact as well as conclusions of law...”). Further, in Smith v. Bear, Inc., 419 S.W.3d 49 (Ky. App. 2013), review denied (Feb. 12, 2014), the Court of Appeals recognized that “jury trials are only a constitutional right when the issues are at law, rather than in equity. Our Supreme Court has held ‘equitable issues are not triable by juries unless agreed to by the parties.’” Id. at 57-58; see also Schultz v. Gen. Elec. Healthcare Fin. Servs., Inc., 360 S.W.3d 171, 175 (Ky. 2012)(holding that equitable issues are not triable by juries unless agreed to by the parties)(citing Daniels v. CDB Bell, LLC, 300 S.W.3d 204, 210 (Ky. App. 2009)).
Some “right” to a jury trial in declaratory judgment actions is not guaranteed by either the Constitution or Kentucky’s Declaratory Judgment statute. As set forth above, Kentucky’s Constitution does not guarantee a party the right to a jury trial in equitable actions. In addition, Kentucky’s Declaratory Judgment statute, KRS 418.040, does not provide a right to a jury trial:
In any action in a court of record of this Commonwealth having general jurisdiction wherein it is made to appear that an actual controversy exists, the plaintiff may ask for a declaration of rights, either alone or with other relief; and the court may make a binding declaration of rights, whether or not consequential relief is or could be asked. (Emphasis added).
Further, CR 57 governs declaratory judgment actions and does not guarantee a right to a jury trial. CR 57 simply provides that there may be a right to a jury if provided by CR 38 or 39. However, as set forth above, neither Civil Rule provides such a “right.” A jury trial may only be permitted in such circumstances if consented to by all parties. (See CR 39.03.)
Defense counsel in Kentucky state court declaratory judgment actions which seek to invalidate a trust, estate or other instrument should strongly consider moving for a bench trial on these claims. If counsel determines that the particular circumstances weigh against a bench trial, they may consent to a jury trial. In most circumstances, however, adjudication of the claims by the court instead of a jury is likely to be more favorable to the defense.
To learn more about Jared A. Cox and his practice, please visit his profile.
- Partner
Jared is a partner in the Firm’s Litigation, Employment, Fiduciary and Appellate Practice Groups. On a day-to-day basis, Jared advises clients and leads litigation involving disputes in the areas of employment, business ...

Subscribe
Recent Posts
- A Farm Trust Isn’t a Farm Trust Without a Farm!
- Don’t Shortchange Your Heirs: Have an Estate Plan for Your Cryptocurrency
- Indiana Opportunity Zone Summit
- Beneficiary Suit Time-Barred by Effect of Trustee Notice
- Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Beneficiaries in State Tax Case
- Family Battles Over Family Farm Trust
- Scandalous or Satisfactory? How New Trademarks Can Test the Boundaries
- Indiana Supreme Court Delineates “Subdivided,” “Reasonably Near Future” Terms in Annexation Statute
- UPDATE: New Policy on Arbitration Agreements for Employers
- New Laws Seek Data, Collaboration from Water Utilities
Categories
Contributors
- John W. Ames
- Jason T. Ams
- Kelly D. Bartley
- Brent R. Baughman
- Kate E. Beatty
- Jeffrey T. Bennett
- Keith A. Bice
- Daniel L. Boots
- Melissa Norman Bork
- Claude R. Chip Bowles Jr.
- Andy Bowman
- Richard Boydston
- Janeia L. Brounson
- Lincoln J. Carr, Sr.
- Brian W. Chellgren, Ph.D.
- Anne A. Chesnut
- Margaret Christensen
- Grantland M. Clapacs
- Briana Clark
- Ross D. Cohen
- Jared A. Cox
- Bruce E. Cryder
- John R. Cummins
- Alan J. Dansker
- D. Rusty Denton
- Ivan M. Diamond
- Trisha S. Dudlo
- Greg J. Duncan
- Mary G. Eaves
- Philip C. Eschels
- Benjamin J. Evans
- Gregory J. Ewing AICP
- Daniel E. Fisher
- K. Michael Gaerte
- Jeremy P. Gerch
- Carmin D. Grandinetti
- Peter H. Grills
- Andrew Gruber
- J. Mark Grundy
- Alex Gude
- Meaghan Klem Haller
- Brad Hasler
- Jeremy Hill
- James M. Hinshaw
- Dwayne Isaacs
- Phil L. Isenbarger
- Eric L. Ison
- Benjamin M. Jakubowicz
- Janet P. Jakubowicz
- Christopher W.D. Jones
- Justin W. Jones
- William J. Kaiser Jr.
- Larry Kane
- Margaret E. Keane
- Jan Keefer
- J. Richard Kiefer
- June N. King
- Michael Kohlhaas
- Grant Krevda
- R. Clay Larkin
- Charles J. Lavelle
- Scott Leisz
- Benjamin J. Lewis
- Mark A. Loyd
- John S. Lueken
- Peggy B. Lyndrup
- Brad R. Maurer
- John McCauley, CIPP (US)
- Michael J. McGee
- David T. McGimpsey
- Kevin P. McGoff
- V. Brandon McGrath
- Jeffrey A. McKenzie
- Holland N. McTyeire V
- Michael A. Mercurio
- Brett J. Miller
- Kyle W. Miller
- Mark Molter
- Christie A. Moore
- Whitney Mosby
- Karl Mulvaney
- R. Matthew Neff
- Gregory A. Neibarger
- Lauren R. Nichols
- Kimberly J. O'Donnell
- Mark H. Oppenheimer
- Tandy C. Patrick
- Andrew M. Pendexter
- Julianna M. Plawecki
- Matthew Price
- Nana Quay-Smith
- James Reed
- Kyle T. Resetarits
- Bailey Roese
- Rene R. Savarise
- Thomas C. Scherer
- Phillip D. Scott
- Randolph Seger
- Leslie M. Smith
- Mary E. Solada
- Hans Steck
- Kenji Tashiro
- Jennifer Kahney Thompson
- Peter L. Thurman Jr.
- David O. Tittle
- Matthew Troyer
- Job D. (Darby) Turner
- Tonya Vachirasomboon
- Christopher Van Bever
- D. Bryan Weese
- Brian W. Welch
- Patrick J. Welsh
- Shannon L. Williams
- April A. Wimberg
- W. Plumer Wiseman Jr.
Archives
- December 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005