A recent decision from the United States Supreme Court, which effectively overrules a recent decision from the Kentucky Supreme Court, will likely change class action litigation for years to come.
Many companies are now drafting and inserting “Class Action Waiver” provisions into agreements with customers and employees. A Class Action Waiver, coupled with an arbitration provision, requires employees and/or customers to forego any class litigation or class arbitration in lieu of individual arbitration of claims against a company. A carefully drafted Class Action Waiver may meaningfully reduce the risk of a single, large judgment against your company, not to mention expensive, lengthy litigation with uncertain outcomes. Despite this appeal, Class Action Waivers require a careful, particularized analysis before implementation.
In Kentucky, the fray started in late 2010, after the Kentucky Supreme Court decided Schnuerle v. Insight Comm. Co. L.P. In Schnuerle, local cable television/Internet provider Insight Communications sought to avoid class litigation from its subscribers by inserting a Class Action Waiver in its customer service agreement. Insight’s customers subsequently filed a class action lawsuit in Jefferson County, Kentucky, alleging breach of contract and violations of the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act – because of Internet service failures in April 2006. Insight argued that its Class Action Waiver, coupled with an arbitration clause in its customer agreement, required each customer to individually arbitrate claims against the company. The Kentucky Supreme Court, however, held that – in the consumer context and under state contract law – Insight could not restrict its customers from joining as a class to pursue their small claims. Nevertheless, the Schnuerle Court required the customers to pursue their class action against Insight in arbitration, rather than state court. The Schnuerle case created an uncertain landscape for Kentucky companies wishing to escape class action claims from customers and employees – until a recent decision from the United States Supreme Court.
On April 27, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, a case in which AT&T Mobility LLC (AT&T) sought to enforce a Class Action Waiver in wireless service agreements with its customers. AT&T’s Class Action Waiver was similar to the provision Insight had with its customers, as it also required customers to file any and all claims against the company individually and in arbitration. Like the Kentucky Supreme Court, the federal courts in California which first heard the Concepcion case ruled that a Class Action Waiver was unenforceable under state law – and AT&T’s customers could pursue their claims as a class.
In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the lower federal courts and held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts any state law or court decision which precludes enforcement of a Class Action Waiver in conjunction with an arbitration provision. The Concepcion Court also held that courts could not force class arbitration upon companies claiming rights under a Class Action Waiver because “[a]rbitration is poorly suited to the higher stakes of class litigation.” This decision required AT&T’s customers to assert their claims, if at all, individually in arbitration. The individual claims in the Concepcion case were only worth about $30 on average, making it highly unlikely any individuals would voluntarily pursue arbitration. Thus, AT&T is relatively immune from class action litigation from its customers.
The Concepcion decision has predictably upset some lawmakers and consumer protection advocates. If and until the FAA is amended, however, companies may benefit – like AT&T – by inserting a Class Action Waiver into arbitration provisions with customers and employees. However, because the Concepcion decision has not been interpreted and applied by any lower courts, companies should carefully analyze whether they are comfortably situated to: (i) litigate certain covered claims individually in arbitration; and (ii) potentially litigate over new legal questions which arise in the wake of Concepcion. Indeed, the National Labor Relations Board recently issued complaints against several companies which maintain Class Action Waivers in employment agreements, on the grounds that such Waivers may unlawfully interfere with employees’ statutory right to engage in concerted activity. Likewise, questions remain over whether Class Action Waivers may prevent companies from compelling class action litigation to efficiently defend against complicated antitrust or wage & hour claims. Companies should also consider the prospect of serial arbitration claims from creative plaintiffs’ attorneys. For most companies, decisions concerning Class Action Waivers will predictably depend upon an individualized assessment of potential class claims, as well as each company’s particularized risk tolerance.
To discuss the pros and cons of inserting a Class Action Waiver in your company’s employee and customer agreements, contact any member of Greenebaum’s Labor and Employment Practice Group.
To learn more about Benjamin J. Lewis and his practice, visit his profile.
Even though the content of the above Greenebaum Doll & McDonald e-bulletin is primarily informative, state and federal law obligates us to inform you that THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT. You have received this advisory because you are a client or friend of the firm.
About Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC
Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC is a widely-respected business law firm with approximately 150 professionals in five offices, serving local, national and international clients in virtually every industry.
Copyright 2011 Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Partner
Ben Lewis is the Co-Chair of the Fiduciary Litigation Practice Group. He focuses his practice on complex business litigation matters, particularly disputes involving breach of fiduciary duty claims against trustees ...

Subscribe
Recent Posts
- What is the Difference Between Venture Capital, Private Equity?
- Recapping the 2018 BGD Legislative Conference
- Municipal Utility Sale Affirmed with Valuable Practice Pointers Learned
- Judge Finds Accepting HUD Subsidy Does Not Stop Eviction Process
- Court Finds No Violation of Public Policy Where Challenge to Trust Causes Minors to Forfeit Inheritance
- Trust Grantor Fails to Exercise His Retained Power Properly
- Five Reasons Why Everyone Needs an Estate Plan
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules, in a Matter of First Impression, “Blocked-Crossing” Statute Preempted under Federal Law
- More Lessons Learned from the Theranos Debacle
- Municipal Utilities Need to Be Smart When Implementing a Smart Meter Program
Categories
Contributors
- David A. Adams
- John W. Ames
- Jason T. Ams
- Kelly D. Bartley
- Brent R. Baughman
- Kate E. Beatty
- Jeffrey T. Bennett
- Keith A. Bice
- Blaine R. Blood
- Jenny E. Bobbitt
- Daniel L. Boots
- Melissa Norman Bork
- Claude R. Chip Bowles Jr.
- Andy Bowman
- Richard Boydston
- Janeia L. Brounson
- Ian J. Busche
- Brian W. Chellgren, Ph.D.
- Anne A. Chesnut
- Margaret Christensen
- Grantland M. Clapacs
- Briana Clark
- Ross D. Cohen
- Jared A. Cox
- Bruce E. Cryder
- John R. Cummins
- Alan J. Dansker
- Morgan A. Davenport
- D. Rusty Denton
- Brenda K. DeVries
- Ivan M. Diamond
- Rosmond J. Dolen
- Trisha S. Dudlo
- Greg J. Duncan
- Mary G. Eaves
- Philip C. Eschels
- Benjamin J. Evans
- Gregory J. Ewing AICP
- Daniel E. Fisher
- K. Michael Gaerte
- Jeremy P. Gerch
- Carmin D. Grandinetti
- Peter H. Grills
- Andrew Gruber
- J. Mark Grundy
- Alex Gude
- Justin Hage
- Meaghan Klem Haller
- Brad Hasler
- Jeremy Hill
- James M. Hinshaw
- James R. Irving
- Dwayne Isaacs
- Phil L. Isenbarger
- Eric L. Ison
- Benjamin M. Jakubowicz
- Janet P. Jakubowicz
- Christopher W.D. Jones
- Justin W. Jones
- William J. Kaiser Jr.
- Larry Kane
- Margaret E. Keane
- Jan Keefer
- J. Richard Kiefer
- June N. King
- Michael Kohlhaas
- Grant Krevda
- R. Clay Larkin
- Charles J. Lavelle
- Scott Leisz
- Benjamin J. Lewis
- Mark A. Loyd
- John S. Lueken
- Peggy B. Lyndrup
- Brad R. Maurer
- John McCauley, CIPP (US)
- Tobin McClamroch
- Michael J. McGee
- David T. McGimpsey
- Kevin P. McGoff
- V. Brandon McGrath
- Jeffrey A. McKenzie
- Holland N. McTyeire V
- Michael A. Mercurio
- Eric J. Metzger
- Brett J. Miller
- Kyle W. Miller
- Melissa Buckley Minix
- Ali Bartlett Miranda
- Mark Molter
- Christie A. Moore
- Whitney Mosby
- Karl Mulvaney
- R. Matthew Neff
- Gregory A. Neibarger
- Lauren R. Nichols
- Kimberly J. O'Donnell
- Mark H. Oppenheimer
- Tandy C. Patrick
- Andrew M. Pendexter
- Julianna M. Plawecki
- Matthew Price
- Nana Quay-Smith
- James Reed
- Kyle T. Resetarits
- Bailey Roese
- Rene R. Savarise
- Thomas C. Scherer
- Phillip D. Scott
- Randolph Seger
- Philip Sicuso
- Leslie M. Smith
- Mary E. Solada
- Hans Steck
- Kenji Tashiro
- Jennifer Kahney Thompson
- Peter L. Thurman Jr.
- David O. Tittle
- Matthew Troyer
- Job D. (Darby) Turner
- Tonya Vachirasomboon
- Christopher Van Bever
- D. Bryan Weese
- Brian W. Welch
- Patrick J. Welsh
- Shannon L. Williams
- Steven R. Wilson
- April A. Wimberg
- W. Plumer Wiseman Jr.
Archives
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005