To the great surprise of the entire estate planning community nationwide, Congress failed to amend the complicated one-year repeal of the Federal estate tax for decedents dying in 2010.
Depending on whether you believe that this tax will be retroactively reinstated by Congress later in 2010, and whether you believe that any retroactive enactment would be constitutional, you may want to take action now to change your estate plan.
The original 2001 tax legislation enacted a gradual decline of the Federal estate and generation-skipping tax over a period from 2001 through 2010. During those years, the exemption increased and the top marginal estate tax rate decreased. In 2010, there will be no Federal estate or generation-skipping tax at all, but assets will generally receive a carryover basis.
Generally speaking, the new basis regime is to carry over the decedent’s basis in each asset as of the moment of death, or change to the fair market value only if lower. Thus, if the decedent has accumulated his or her estate over a period of 50 years, buying securities, realty and other assets, it could be necessary to go back over 50 years of records in order to determine the cost basis of each asset.
The law creates two important exceptions to this carryover basis rule, however. First, each estate gets a $1.3 million increase in basis (plus unused losses and loss carryovers), assuming the assets in the estate have appreciated at least that much and are of a kind that are eligible for a basis step-up at death (e.g., excluding IRAs). For those estates which have more than $1.3 million in appreciation as of death in such assets, then it is possible to obtain up to another $3 million in basis increase for qualifying assets which pass to the spouse outright or in a marital trust. To maximize the basis increase, the estate plan must be written to take advantage of both of these exceptions. In some cases, gift transfers to a dying spouse by the other spouse can help utilize this basis adjustment.
Because the one-year repeal of the Federal estate tax was combined with a reduction in the basis step-up at death, and because the latter rules were added at the last minute in a slap-dash fashion, all estate planning pundits predicted, at the very least, technical corrections to the basis adjustment rules, if not a total change in the law. However, as we have all read, and despite legislative initiatives almost every year since 2001, no change to the law was made. In late 2009, the Senate failed to pass a one-year extension of the Federal estate tax. Some predict that it will be difficult for the Senate to pass retroactive legislation in 2010 reinstating the Federal estate tax, given the 60 vote requirement in the Senate, the solid Republican voting bloc and the defection of several Democrats to the Republican view on this subject in late 2009. Health care legislation in early 2010 and election year politics thereafter complicate the picture further.
What, then, does this mean to you? It affects you most if you are either a married couple with over $2.5 million of appreciation in your estate, or are in a second or subsequent marriage or if you have left your estate tax exemption amount in a formula bequest to one or more designated beneficiaries. In each of these cases, this repeal of the estate tax could distort your estate plan should you die in 2010 and should the Federal estate tax not be retroactively (and constitutionally) reinstated. While we at Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC cannot foresee the political future of the estate tax issue, we did feel it necessary to make you aware that the Federal estate tax had been repealed for one year and could affect your estate plan should you die during an effective period of repeal. If you wish to address this issue in your own plan, including a specific set of provisions covering the scenario of no estate tax, please contact your estate planner at our firm.
There are some opportunities in the new law too. The gift tax survives, with a $1 million lifetime exemption and a reduced 35% rate. Further, the generation-skipping tax has been repealed both for gifts and estates in 2010. Generation-skipping gifts, as well as distributions from existing non-exempt generation-skipping trusts, would be favored by the new law. The risk is that Congress might revoke these tax benefits by passing retroactive changes later this year.
We at Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC have watched these issues closely over the years, but like most estate planners felt that it was not in our clients’ best interests to plan for a tax law situation that was widely predicted to be changed legislatively before it took effect. At this point, since Congress has defied all of the predictions, we feel compelled to bring this issue to you for your own consideration and decision as to whether or not action should be taken.
Louisville Office John R. Cummins, Esq. Wealth Planning Team Chair (502) 587-3602 | Greater Cincinnati Office Suzanne P. Land, Esq. (513) 455-7619 | |
John S. Lueken, Esq. (502) 587-3509 Mark H. Oppenheimer, Esq. (502) 587-3698 | William L. Montague, Esq. (513) 455-7610 |
Even though the content of the above Greenebaum Doll & McDonald e-bulletin is primarily informative, state and federal law obligates us to inform you that this is an advertisement. You have received this advisory because you are a client or friend of the firm.
About Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC
Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC is a widely-respected business law firm with approximately 170 professionals in five offices, serving local, national and international clients in virtually every industry. A forward-thinking business law firm, Greenebaum is committed to the practice of Breakthrough Law®.
Copyright 2010 Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Partner
John is a partner in the firm's Estate Planning Department. He focuses his practice on estates, trusts, family business and disability planning, and the administration of estates and trusts. John also has an active health law ...
- Partner
John is Chair of the firm's Estate Planning Department. He also leads the firm's Senior Partner Committee, and is a member of the firm's Finance Committee. John, a former Certified Public Accountant, began his career in the tax ...
- Partner
Mark is a partner in the Louisville office and is a member of the Estate Planning and Business Services Departments. Mark concentrates his practice on business succession, estate planning and estate administration for ...

Subscribe
Recent Posts
- What is the Difference Between Venture Capital, Private Equity?
- Recapping the 2018 BGD Legislative Conference
- Municipal Utility Sale Affirmed with Valuable Practice Pointers Learned
- Judge Finds Accepting HUD Subsidy Does Not Stop Eviction Process
- Court Finds No Violation of Public Policy Where Challenge to Trust Causes Minors to Forfeit Inheritance
- Trust Grantor Fails to Exercise His Retained Power Properly
- Five Reasons Why Everyone Needs an Estate Plan
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules, in a Matter of First Impression, “Blocked-Crossing” Statute Preempted under Federal Law
- More Lessons Learned from the Theranos Debacle
- Municipal Utilities Need to Be Smart When Implementing a Smart Meter Program
Categories
Contributors
- David A. Adams
- John W. Ames
- Jason T. Ams
- Kelly D. Bartley
- Brent R. Baughman
- Kate E. Beatty
- Jeffrey T. Bennett
- Keith A. Bice
- Blaine R. Blood
- Jenny E. Bobbitt
- Daniel L. Boots
- Melissa Norman Bork
- Claude R. Chip Bowles Jr.
- Andy Bowman
- Richard Boydston
- Janeia L. Brounson
- Ian J. Busche
- Brian W. Chellgren, Ph.D.
- Anne A. Chesnut
- Margaret Christensen
- Grantland M. Clapacs
- Briana Clark
- Ross D. Cohen
- Jared A. Cox
- Bruce E. Cryder
- John R. Cummins
- Alan J. Dansker
- Morgan A. Davenport
- D. Rusty Denton
- Brenda K. DeVries
- Ivan M. Diamond
- Rosmond J. Dolen
- Trisha S. Dudlo
- Greg J. Duncan
- Mary G. Eaves
- Philip C. Eschels
- Benjamin J. Evans
- Gregory J. Ewing AICP
- Daniel E. Fisher
- K. Michael Gaerte
- Jeremy P. Gerch
- Carmin D. Grandinetti
- Peter H. Grills
- Andrew Gruber
- J. Mark Grundy
- Alex Gude
- Justin Hage
- Meaghan Klem Haller
- Brad Hasler
- Jeremy Hill
- James M. Hinshaw
- James R. Irving
- Dwayne Isaacs
- Phil L. Isenbarger
- Eric L. Ison
- Benjamin M. Jakubowicz
- Janet P. Jakubowicz
- Christopher W.D. Jones
- Justin W. Jones
- William J. Kaiser Jr.
- Larry Kane
- Margaret E. Keane
- Jan Keefer
- J. Richard Kiefer
- June N. King
- Michael Kohlhaas
- Grant Krevda
- R. Clay Larkin
- Charles J. Lavelle
- Scott Leisz
- Benjamin J. Lewis
- Mark A. Loyd
- John S. Lueken
- Peggy B. Lyndrup
- Brad R. Maurer
- John McCauley, CIPP (US)
- Tobin McClamroch
- Michael J. McGee
- David T. McGimpsey
- Kevin P. McGoff
- V. Brandon McGrath
- Jeffrey A. McKenzie
- Holland N. McTyeire V
- Michael A. Mercurio
- Eric J. Metzger
- Brett J. Miller
- Kyle W. Miller
- Melissa Buckley Minix
- Ali Bartlett Miranda
- Mark Molter
- Christie A. Moore
- Whitney Mosby
- Karl Mulvaney
- R. Matthew Neff
- Gregory A. Neibarger
- Lauren R. Nichols
- Kimberly J. O'Donnell
- Mark H. Oppenheimer
- Tandy C. Patrick
- Andrew M. Pendexter
- Julianna M. Plawecki
- Matthew Price
- Nana Quay-Smith
- James Reed
- Kyle T. Resetarits
- Bailey Roese
- Rene R. Savarise
- Thomas C. Scherer
- Phillip D. Scott
- Randolph Seger
- Philip Sicuso
- Leslie M. Smith
- Mary E. Solada
- Hans Steck
- Kenji Tashiro
- Jennifer Kahney Thompson
- Peter L. Thurman Jr.
- David O. Tittle
- Matthew Troyer
- Job D. (Darby) Turner
- Tonya Vachirasomboon
- Christopher Van Bever
- D. Bryan Weese
- Brian W. Welch
- Patrick J. Welsh
- Shannon L. Williams
- Steven R. Wilson
- April A. Wimberg
- W. Plumer Wiseman Jr.
Archives
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005