
On March 15, 2015, Flat Rock Wind, LLC (“Flat Rock”), a subsidiary of Apex Clean Energy, submitted to the Rush County Board of Zoning Appeals (the “BZA”) an application for a special exception permit (the “Application”) to construct a 180 megawatt commercial Wind Energy Conversion System (“WECS”), commonly known as a wind farm, on over 29,000 acres of land located in Rush and Henry Counties. Specifically, Flat Rock planned to install ninety-five three megawatt wind turbines, with approximately sixty-six wind turbines located in Rush County. The BZA held a public hearing on the Application on May 7, 2015. There, Flat Rock and other supporters testified in favor of the WECS. The BZA also received comments from a group of opponents (the “Landowners”), regarding allegations of potential adverse health effects and impact on property values from the proposed WECS. One such comment the Landowners presented to the BZA was a paper authored by two acoustical engineering “experts” on studies describing alleged health effects associated with living in the vicinity of this type of wind turbine and recommending a setback distance of at least one kilometer, or approximately 3,280 feet, between a rural residence and the proposed wind turbines. Consistent with this recommendation, the BZA was requested to impose increased setback distances between the turbines and residences as a condition on any grant of this particular Application.
Needing additional time to evaluate the specific issues, the BZA continued the public hearing. Flat Rock subsequently amended its Application to include a setback distance of 1,400 feet. On July 1, 2015, the BZA conducted a lengthy public hearing on the amended Application. Flat Rock presented testimony and submittals which set out the benefits to the county of its proposed project and which it believed established compliance with the required findings of fact. Once more, Landowners refuted Flat Rock’s submittals and addressed the potential for adverse health effects and decreased property values from proximity to the proposed turbines. Moreover, the BZA’s staff submitted their own “research” addressing the particular sounds and low frequency noises of commercial wind turbines, and the alleged resulting long-term adverse health effects on those living nearby. The BZA also received information alleging hazards associated with ice and blade throw from wind turbines constructed as proposed by Flat Rock. Additionally, information was presented alleging a significant reduction in property value from a turbine on the property. Flat Rock, of course, highly disagreed with these assertions.
Following the hearing’s public comment period, a BZA member moved to approve Flat Rock’s WECS Application as presented. The motion failed for lack of a second. Another BZA member then moved to approve the Application with the condition that the setback distance be increased to 2,640 feet from any property line. This motion also failed for lack of a second. Then, a third BZA member moved to approve the Application with the condition that the setback distance between the wind turbines and the properties of non-participating owners be 2,300 feet. This time, the motion passed by a majority vote of the BZA.
On July 22, 2015, Flat Rock timely filed a timely verified petition for judicial review of the BZA’s decision. Arguments of counsel were heard on April 13, 2016. On May 27, 2016, a Rush County Superior Court judge issued findings of fact and conclusions of law and affirmed the BZA’s approval of Flat Rock’s WECS Application, with the 2,300-foot setback provision. In doing so, the Court cited the BZA’s requirement under Section 10.2 the Rush County Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning Ordinance”) to find that “‘satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning’ matters such as the economic and noise effects on adjoining properties generally in the district, screening or buffering ‘objectionable or unsafe’ views, noises or vibrations, and the ‘general compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district.’” Recognizing that the BZA’s decision is presumed correct under Indiana law, and consequently that the BZA’s conditional approval of the Application is “entitled to great weight and deference by this Court,” the Court found that “the Setback Condition was supported by substantial evidence in the record,” as “[t]he evidence received by the BZA supported setback distances of at least 2,300 feet from a non-participating owner’s property line for reasons of both health and preservation of property values.”
Thus, the Court’s affirmation of the BZA’s approval of the Application with the 2,300-feet setback distance was based upon comments and information provided in the record before the BZA, which the Court determined to be adequate evidence; that is, the Court determined that, under the circumstances, the BZA’s finding that the setback distance was necessary to protect the health and safety of non-participating property owners was in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance — an extremely fact-sensitive determination that is necessarily confined to these circumstances. Because the Court’s decision has not been reviewed by the Indiana Court of Appeals or the Indiana Supreme Court, no precedent is created from this decision that will bind other trial courts faced with similar facts.
Flat Rock has until Monday, June 27 to either file a motion to correct error with the Rush County Superior Court or appeal to the Court of Appeals.
See Flat Rock Wind, LLC v. Rush Cnty. Area Bd. of Zoning Appeals and Intervening Respondents, Case No. 70D01-1507-PL-000220
To learn more about Mary E. Solada and her practice, please visit her profile.
To learn more about Melissa J. Buckley and her practice, please visit her profile.
- Partner
Mary is experienced in all aspects of real estate development, zoning and planning law, as well as government services and is the former chair of the firm's Real Estate practice group. She is a 1982 graduate of Indiana University ...
- Associate
Melissa Buckley Minix is an attorney in the firm’s Litigation Department, where she practices general business litigation. She also assists the firm’s appellate practice group.

Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Plunging into Virtual Water with Jenny Kehl [PODCAST]
- DOJ Targets Prescribers of Opioids for Prosecution
- Florida Trustee’s Failure to File Trust Accountings and Tax Returns Results in Trust Freeze
- Darby Turner Named a Public Policy Advocate of the Year
- Anatomy of Municipal Water Rates with Scott Miller [PODCAST]
- IRS Approves Extended Retirement Plan Distributions to a Trust
- Interview with Bailey Roese on the KDP
- Sixth Circuit’s Asylum Ruling Vacates Board of Immigration Appeals Decision Under High Abuse of Discretion Standard
- Event Recap: 2017 BGD Legislative Conference
- Informal Trust Contest Fails and Subsequent Lawsuit Time-Barred
Categories
Contributors
- David A. Adams
- John W. Ames
- Jason T. Ams
- Ali Bartlett Miranda
- Kelly D. Bartley
- Brent R. Baughman
- Kate E. Beatty
- Jeffrey T. Bennett
- Keith A. Bice
- Blaine R. Blood
- Daniel L. Boots
- Melissa Norman Bork
- Claude R. Chip Bowles Jr.
- Andy Bowman
- Richard Boydston
- Brian W. Chellgren, Ph.D.
- Anne A. Chesnut
- Margaret Christensen
- Grantland M. Clapacs
- Briana Clark
- Ross D. Cohen
- Jared A. Cox
- Bruce E. Cryder
- John R. Cummins
- Alan J. Dansker
- Morgan A. Davenport
- D. Rusty Denton
- Brenda K. DeVries
- Ivan M. Diamond
- Rosmond J. Dolen
- Greg J. Duncan
- Mary G. Eaves
- James C. Eaves Jr.
- Philip C. Eschels
- Benjamin J. Evans
- Gregory J. Ewing AICP
- Daniel E. Fisher
- K. Michael Gaerte
- Jeremy P. Gerch
- Carmin D. Grandinetti
- Peter H. Grills
- Andrew Gruber
- J. Mark Grundy
- Alex Gude
- Justin Hage
- Meaghan Klem Haller
- Brad Hasler
- Margaret E. Hayes
- Jeremy Hill
- James M. Hinshaw
- Dwayne Isaacs
- Phil L. Isenbarger
- Eric L. Ison
- Janet P. Jakubowicz
- Christopher W.D. Jones
- William J. Kaiser Jr.
- Larry Kane
- Margaret E. Keane
- Jan Keefer
- J. Richard Kiefer
- June N. King
- Michael Kohlhaas
- Grant Krevda
- R. Clay Larkin
- Charles J. Lavelle
- Scott Leisz
- Benjamin J. Lewis
- Mark A. Loyd
- John S. Lueken
- Peggy B. Lyndrup
- Brad R. Maurer
- John McCauley, CIPP (US)
- Tobin McClamroch
- Michael J. McGee
- David T. McGimpsey
- Kevin P. McGoff
- V. Brandon McGrath
- Jeffrey A. McKenzie
- Holland N. McTyeire V
- Eric J. Metzger
- Brett J. Miller
- Kyle Miller
- Melissa Buckley Minix
- Christie A. Moore
- Roderick Morgan
- Whitney Mosby
- Karl Mulvaney
- Gregory A. Neibarger
- Kimberly J. O'Donnell
- Mark H. Oppenheimer
- Young-Eun Park
- Tandy C. Patrick
- Andrew M. Pendexter
- Julianna M. Plawecki
- Matthew Price
- Nana Quay-Smith
- James Reed
- Kyle T. Resetarits
- Alex S. Rodger
- Bailey Roese
- Rene R. Savarise
- Thomas C. Scherer
- Phillip D. Scott
- Randolph Seger
- Philip Sicuso
- Leslie M. Smith
- Mary E. Solada
- Hans Steck
- Kenji Tashiro
- Jennifer Kahney Thompson
- Peter L. Thurman Jr.
- David O. Tittle
- Matthew Troyer
- Job D. (Darby) Turner
- Tonya Vachirasomboon
- Christopher Van Bever
- D. Bryan Weese
- Brian W. Welch
- Patrick J. Welsh
- Benjamin Weyman
- Shannon L. Williams
- Steven R. Wilson
- April A. Wimberg
- W. Plumer Wiseman Jr.
Archives
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005