On June 29, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the per se prohibition on vertical restraints. Under this rule which has been in existence for 96 years since Dr. Miles Medical Company v. John D. Park & Sons, Co., resale price maintenance agreements were per se illegal. Under the per se rule no justification is allowed since the conduct “always or almost always tends to restrict competition and decrease output.”
In last month’s 5 to 4 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., the Supreme Court held that resale price maintenance should be evaluated under the rule of reason standard rather than the per se standard. Under the rule of reason standard, courts are allowed to consider the pro-competitive and anti-competitive effects of conduct. Minimum price restraints, such as at issue in the Leegin case, may be justified according to the court by pro-competitive rationales. For instance, a manufacturer may want to impose minimum resale prices to guarantee sufficient return so that the retailers will invest in “tangible or intangible services or promotional efforts that aid the manufacturer’s position as against rival manufacturers.” As a result, resale price maintenance may foster competition by keeping manufacturers in the business who might not otherwise be able to continue.
It also, according to the court, gives consumers more options since they have the ability to choose “among low-price, low-service brands; high-price, high-service brands; and brands that fall in between the two.” In antitrust terms, resale price maintenance can increase inter-brand competition by restricting intra-brand competition.
The case before the Supreme Court involved a challenge to the pricing policies of Leegin Creative Leather Products, a manufacturer of leather goods and accessories. Under its policies, retailers were prohibited from selling Leegin products below Leegin’s suggested retail prices. A retailer, PSKS, who was terminated by Leegin for violating its policy, sued alleging that Leegin had violated the antitrust laws by requiring it to sell at or above suggested retail prices. In accordance with the Dr. Miles case, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found that the Leegin resales price maintenance was per se illegal and entered judgment against Leegin for nearly $4 million. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and, after considering the arguments, reversed.
In its decision, the court acknowledged that in some instances resale price maintenance may pose a threat to competition such as when it facilitates a manufacturer’s cartel. In such case, the restraints may assist the cartel in determining whether a manufacturer-member of the cartel is selling below the cartel’s agreed-upon prices since retail prices are easier to monitor than wholesale prices. The court also noted that resale price maintenance may “be used to organize cartels at the retail level.” In such cases, colluding retailers could solicit a manufacturer to enforce the price levels agreed upon by the retailer cartel. However, the court felt that these arguments confirmed that the resale price maintenance should be evaluated under the rule of reason standard, since the standard enables courts to consider anti-competitive effects as well as pro-competitive effects.
To distinguish between pro-competitive and anti-competitive effects, the court recommended that lower courts consider a number of factors including the number of manufacturers using the practice, the source of the restraint (whether initiated by retailers or the manufacturer), and the market power of the manufacturer or retailer. For instance, minimum retail price restraints imposed by several competing manufacturers in an oligopolistic market at the request of a retailer cartel, according to the court, would pose a serious threat to competition. On the other hand, a similar restraint imposed by a single manufacturer in a crowded market would not pose such a threat.
Notwithstanding the Dr. Miles decision, the courts had allowed manufacturers to support minimum prices in a number of instances. Since the Supreme Court’s 1919 decision in United States v. Colgate, “a manufacturer [could] now suggest resale prices and refuse to deal with distributors who do not follow them.” In addition, manufacturers have been able to use minimum advertised pricing programs to influence prices. Commonly seen television and print ads with “suggested manufacturer’s resale price” are examples.
While the Supreme Court decided the case on the basis of federal law, there are still a number of state laws to consider. The Leegin case only overturned the federal per se rule against vertical minimum price restraints. Many states still retain per se rules for violations of resale price maintenance under their antitrust laws. At this point is uncertain whether those states will follow the Leegin court’s lead in changing the standard. Because of this uncertainty under state law, from a practical standpoint companies should continue to rely on the previous rules allowing termination of distributors who do not follow suggested resale prices until such time as the states have had a chance to look at their own laws.

Subscribe
Recent Posts
- What is the Difference Between Venture Capital, Private Equity?
- Recapping the 2018 BGD Legislative Conference
- Municipal Utility Sale Affirmed with Valuable Practice Pointers Learned
- Judge Finds Accepting HUD Subsidy Does Not Stop Eviction Process
- Court Finds No Violation of Public Policy Where Challenge to Trust Causes Minors to Forfeit Inheritance
- Trust Grantor Fails to Exercise His Retained Power Properly
- Five Reasons Why Everyone Needs an Estate Plan
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules, in a Matter of First Impression, “Blocked-Crossing” Statute Preempted under Federal Law
- More Lessons Learned from the Theranos Debacle
- Municipal Utilities Need to Be Smart When Implementing a Smart Meter Program
Categories
Contributors
- David A. Adams
- John W. Ames
- Jason T. Ams
- Kelly D. Bartley
- Brent R. Baughman
- Kate E. Beatty
- Jeffrey T. Bennett
- Keith A. Bice
- Blaine R. Blood
- Jenny E. Bobbitt
- Daniel L. Boots
- Melissa Norman Bork
- Claude R. Chip Bowles Jr.
- Andy Bowman
- Richard Boydston
- Janeia L. Brounson
- Ian J. Busche
- Brian W. Chellgren, Ph.D.
- Anne A. Chesnut
- Margaret Christensen
- Grantland M. Clapacs
- Briana Clark
- Ross D. Cohen
- Jared A. Cox
- Bruce E. Cryder
- John R. Cummins
- Alan J. Dansker
- Morgan A. Davenport
- D. Rusty Denton
- Brenda K. DeVries
- Ivan M. Diamond
- Rosmond J. Dolen
- Trisha S. Dudlo
- Greg J. Duncan
- Mary G. Eaves
- Philip C. Eschels
- Benjamin J. Evans
- Gregory J. Ewing AICP
- Daniel E. Fisher
- K. Michael Gaerte
- Jeremy P. Gerch
- Carmin D. Grandinetti
- Peter H. Grills
- Andrew Gruber
- J. Mark Grundy
- Alex Gude
- Justin Hage
- Meaghan Klem Haller
- Brad Hasler
- Jeremy Hill
- James M. Hinshaw
- James R. Irving
- Dwayne Isaacs
- Phil L. Isenbarger
- Eric L. Ison
- Benjamin M. Jakubowicz
- Janet P. Jakubowicz
- Christopher W.D. Jones
- Justin W. Jones
- William J. Kaiser Jr.
- Larry Kane
- Margaret E. Keane
- Jan Keefer
- J. Richard Kiefer
- June N. King
- Michael Kohlhaas
- Grant Krevda
- R. Clay Larkin
- Charles J. Lavelle
- Scott Leisz
- Benjamin J. Lewis
- Mark A. Loyd
- John S. Lueken
- Peggy B. Lyndrup
- Brad R. Maurer
- John McCauley, CIPP (US)
- Tobin McClamroch
- Michael J. McGee
- David T. McGimpsey
- Kevin P. McGoff
- V. Brandon McGrath
- Jeffrey A. McKenzie
- Holland N. McTyeire V
- Michael A. Mercurio
- Eric J. Metzger
- Brett J. Miller
- Kyle W. Miller
- Melissa Buckley Minix
- Ali Bartlett Miranda
- Mark Molter
- Christie A. Moore
- Whitney Mosby
- Karl Mulvaney
- R. Matthew Neff
- Gregory A. Neibarger
- Lauren R. Nichols
- Kimberly J. O'Donnell
- Mark H. Oppenheimer
- Tandy C. Patrick
- Andrew M. Pendexter
- Julianna M. Plawecki
- Matthew Price
- Nana Quay-Smith
- James Reed
- Kyle T. Resetarits
- Bailey Roese
- Rene R. Savarise
- Thomas C. Scherer
- Phillip D. Scott
- Randolph Seger
- Philip Sicuso
- Leslie M. Smith
- Mary E. Solada
- Hans Steck
- Kenji Tashiro
- Jennifer Kahney Thompson
- Peter L. Thurman Jr.
- David O. Tittle
- Matthew Troyer
- Job D. (Darby) Turner
- Tonya Vachirasomboon
- Christopher Van Bever
- D. Bryan Weese
- Brian W. Welch
- Patrick J. Welsh
- Shannon L. Williams
- Steven R. Wilson
- April A. Wimberg
- W. Plumer Wiseman Jr.
Archives
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005