.jpg)
Now more than ever, consumers consider the environmental consequences of their purchases. But what makes a product “green”? Recent revisions to the Federal Trade Commission’s “Green Guides” include a number of modifications addressing environmental marketing claims that businesses must understand in order to stay competitive in an increasingly environmentally conscious marketplace.
The FTC Green Guides
One trip down a grocery aisle or one commercial break during the ballgame makes it clear: to succeed in today’s marketplace, a business must market the environmental benefits of its products. Whether a product is truly “green” is relative to the circumstances. All products use energy and resources, and all products create waste. How then can a business market the environmental benefits of its products without overstating the true impact?
The FTC has intervened to clarify what may be said about a product’s environmental impact. The FTC recently revised its Green Guides, adopting a more holistic approach to review environmental marketing claims. The Guides are not agency rules or regulations, but rather help the agency in determining whether environmental claims are misleading and deceptive. If claims are determined to be misleading and deceptive, the agency can take enforcement action, which can lead to fines or FTC orders that prohibit deceptive advertising. The Guides make a number of modifications to older guidelines and contain new sections to address developing issues.
“Environmentally friendly” and “eco-friendly” products
The revised Guides caution businesses not to make broad claims that a product is “environmentally friendly” or “eco-friendly.” Consumer protection studies show that when a consumer sees such broad claims, the consumer internalizes that the product has specific and far-reaching environmental benefits. Instead, the Guides instruct businesses to qualify general claims with specific environmental benefits, allowing consumers to better understand the consequences of their purchases. To avoid further confusion, the Guides warn not to highlight small or unimportant benefits. For example, a lawn mower manufacturer advertises its new line of lawn mowers as more eco-friendly due to increased fuel efficiency. In fact, the lawn mower manufacturer has increased the fuel efficiency by 0.1 percent. The manufacturer’s claim is technically correct, but the advertisement would likely convey a false impression of significantly increased fuel efficiency and broad environmental benefits.
Recyclable or degradable products
The revised Guides also caution businesses who claim their products are recyclable or degradable. A business may make an unqualified claim that a product is degradable only if it can be proven that the entire product will completely break down within a reasonably short period of time, which the FTC considers to be one year after disposal. Businesses who claim that a product is recyclable must take into account the availability of recycling facilities where the product is sold. If recycling facilities are not available to at least 60 percent of the consumers or communities where a product is sold, businesses are encouraged to identify the limitation or to clarify that the product may not be recyclable within the consumer’s area. When a product is made from recycled materials, the Guides also provide direction. Businesses are instructed to qualify claims for products that are made partly from recycled materials by stating the percentage of the product that is actually comprised of recycled materials.
Products made with renewable energy
The revised Guides add new sections to address environmental claims that were not common when the Guides were last reviewed. One new section addresses claims that a product is made with renewable energy. Businesses should not make an unqualified “made with renewable energy” claim unless virtually all of the manufacturing processes involved in making the product are powered with renewable energy. Businesses are also encouraged to specify the source of renewable energy, such as wind or solar energy.
Products “free of” certain substances
Another new section addresses claims that a product does not contain, or is “free of,” certain substances. This section advises that “free of” claims, even if true, may be deceptive if the product contains substances that pose similar environmental risks as the substance not present, or if the “free of” substance has not been previously associated with the product.
The willingness of consumers to consider the environmental impacts of their product purchases is a clear trend that your business must consider to maintain or increase its market share. But you must understand how to accurately communicate your product’s environmental benefits. The FTC’s Green Guides attempt to clarify for the business community how to market environmental benefits while stopping misleading claims.
If you have questions about how the FTC’s new Guides may affect your or your business, please contact a member of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP’s Environmental and Natural Resources Practice Group.
DISCLOSURE REQUIRED BY CIRCULAR 230. This Disclosure may be required by Circular 230 issued by the Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. If this article, including any attachments, contains any federal tax advice, such advice is not intended or written by the practitioner to be used, and it may not be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. Furthermore, any federal tax advice herein (including any attachment hereto) may not be used or referred to in promoting, marketing or recommending a transaction or arrangement to another party. Further information concerning this disclosure, and the reasons for such disclosure, may be obtained upon request from the author of this article. Thank you.

Subscribe
Recent Posts
- What is the Difference Between Venture Capital, Private Equity?
- Recapping the 2018 BGD Legislative Conference
- Municipal Utility Sale Affirmed with Valuable Practice Pointers Learned
- Judge Finds Accepting HUD Subsidy Does Not Stop Eviction Process
- Court Finds No Violation of Public Policy Where Challenge to Trust Causes Minors to Forfeit Inheritance
- Trust Grantor Fails to Exercise His Retained Power Properly
- Five Reasons Why Everyone Needs an Estate Plan
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules, in a Matter of First Impression, “Blocked-Crossing” Statute Preempted under Federal Law
- More Lessons Learned from the Theranos Debacle
- Municipal Utilities Need to Be Smart When Implementing a Smart Meter Program
Categories
Contributors
- David A. Adams
- John W. Ames
- Jason T. Ams
- Kelly D. Bartley
- Brent R. Baughman
- Kate E. Beatty
- Jeffrey T. Bennett
- Keith A. Bice
- Blaine R. Blood
- Jenny E. Bobbitt
- Daniel L. Boots
- Melissa Norman Bork
- Claude R. Chip Bowles Jr.
- Andy Bowman
- Richard Boydston
- Janeia L. Brounson
- Ian J. Busche
- Brian W. Chellgren, Ph.D.
- Anne A. Chesnut
- Margaret Christensen
- Grantland M. Clapacs
- Briana Clark
- Ross D. Cohen
- Jared A. Cox
- Bruce E. Cryder
- John R. Cummins
- Alan J. Dansker
- Morgan A. Davenport
- D. Rusty Denton
- Brenda K. DeVries
- Ivan M. Diamond
- Rosmond J. Dolen
- Trisha S. Dudlo
- Greg J. Duncan
- Mary G. Eaves
- Philip C. Eschels
- Benjamin J. Evans
- Gregory J. Ewing AICP
- Daniel E. Fisher
- K. Michael Gaerte
- Jeremy P. Gerch
- Carmin D. Grandinetti
- Peter H. Grills
- Andrew Gruber
- J. Mark Grundy
- Alex Gude
- Justin Hage
- Meaghan Klem Haller
- Brad Hasler
- Jeremy Hill
- James M. Hinshaw
- James R. Irving
- Dwayne Isaacs
- Phil L. Isenbarger
- Eric L. Ison
- Benjamin M. Jakubowicz
- Janet P. Jakubowicz
- Christopher W.D. Jones
- Justin W. Jones
- William J. Kaiser Jr.
- Larry Kane
- Margaret E. Keane
- Jan Keefer
- J. Richard Kiefer
- June N. King
- Michael Kohlhaas
- Grant Krevda
- R. Clay Larkin
- Charles J. Lavelle
- Scott Leisz
- Benjamin J. Lewis
- Mark A. Loyd
- John S. Lueken
- Peggy B. Lyndrup
- Brad R. Maurer
- John McCauley, CIPP (US)
- Tobin McClamroch
- Michael J. McGee
- David T. McGimpsey
- Kevin P. McGoff
- V. Brandon McGrath
- Jeffrey A. McKenzie
- Holland N. McTyeire V
- Michael A. Mercurio
- Eric J. Metzger
- Brett J. Miller
- Kyle W. Miller
- Melissa Buckley Minix
- Ali Bartlett Miranda
- Mark Molter
- Christie A. Moore
- Whitney Mosby
- Karl Mulvaney
- R. Matthew Neff
- Gregory A. Neibarger
- Lauren R. Nichols
- Kimberly J. O'Donnell
- Mark H. Oppenheimer
- Tandy C. Patrick
- Andrew M. Pendexter
- Julianna M. Plawecki
- Matthew Price
- Nana Quay-Smith
- James Reed
- Kyle T. Resetarits
- Bailey Roese
- Rene R. Savarise
- Thomas C. Scherer
- Phillip D. Scott
- Randolph Seger
- Philip Sicuso
- Leslie M. Smith
- Mary E. Solada
- Hans Steck
- Kenji Tashiro
- Jennifer Kahney Thompson
- Peter L. Thurman Jr.
- David O. Tittle
- Matthew Troyer
- Job D. (Darby) Turner
- Tonya Vachirasomboon
- Christopher Van Bever
- D. Bryan Weese
- Brian W. Welch
- Patrick J. Welsh
- Shannon L. Williams
- Steven R. Wilson
- April A. Wimberg
- W. Plumer Wiseman Jr.
Archives
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- August 2005
- June 2005